The SoTL Advocate

Supporting efforts to make public the reflection and study of teaching and learning at Illinois State University and beyond…

SoTL Methods Series #2: Content Analysis

1 Comment

Written by Jennifer Friberg, CSD/SoTL Scholar-Mentor at Illinois State University

Content analysis is defined as systematic and replicable analysis of written, spoken or visual data in order to make inferences from that data with regard to a particular context (Friberg & Cox, 2014). Fraenkel and Wallen describe content analysis as follows (2003, p. 482):

“Content analysis as a methodology is often used in conjunction with other meds, in particular historical and ethnographic research. It can be used in any context in which [a] researcher desires a means of systemizing and (often) quantifying data. It is extremely valuable in analyzing observation and interview data.”

Content analysis can be conducted in an inductive or deductive manner. Both inductive and deductive content analyses involve the arrangement of data into categories for interpretation; however, there are differences in how this occurs. Bishop-Clark and Dietz-Uhler (2012) describe the types of content analysis as follows:

  • Inductive content analysis occurs by sifting through data to identify themes that emerge organically from the data being analyzed.
  • Deductive content analysis occurs when researchers utilize categories established in earlier research, often in an effort to formulate, support, or refute a theory.

The determination of whether to use inductive or deductive content analysis is typically guided by the topic being studied. Data analyzed through content analysis is coded for interpretation. Content analysis is often used in conjunction with other research methods as part of a mixed-method project.

Exemplar articles using a case study methodology include the following:

Gelbman, S. M. (2011). A qualitative assessment of the learning outcomes of teaching introductory American politics in comparative perspective. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(4), 359–374.

Maldoni, A., Kennelly, R. & Davies, D. (2009). Integrating discipline-based reading to improve intercultural and international learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of teaching and Learning, 3(1), article 8.

Blog References:

Bishop-Clark, C. & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2012). Engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning: A guide to the process, and how to develop a project from start to finish. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Friberg, J. & Cox, M. (2014, October). Selecting methodologies for your SoTL research projects workshop: Supplemental workshop resource. Unpublished paper.

Advertisements

One thought on “SoTL Methods Series #2: Content Analysis

  1. Pingback: Seeking Blog Contributors for Fall 2017 SoTL Methods Series | The SoTL Advocate

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s